AML/CFT

  • FATF Travel Rule Consultation: What EU Payment Firms and CASPs Should Consider

    A cross-border payment is held due to incomplete beneficiary information. The originator name is present, the amount is present, but the beneficiary field is a single block of free text that the receiving institution’s screening engine cannot parse into a name, a country and a town. The transfer is held, a customer complains, and an…

  • CSSF de-risking communique: managing ML/FT risk instead of avoiding it, what Luxembourg-regulated firms must address in their AML/CFT frameworks

    A relationship manager flags a client as awkward. The country profile is messy, the ownership chain runs through two jurisdictions, and the file would take real work to keep current. The easy answer is to exit. Close the account, decline the onboarding, and the risk number on the dashboard goes down. The CSSF communique of…

  • MAS Single Family Office Framework: What Changes from 15 June 2026

    Run a single family office in Singapore on the wrong legal basis and you are doing one of two uncomfortable things: managing money without a licence, or relying on an exemption that no longer fits how the rules read. From 15 June 2026, the MAS Single Family Office framework replaces the old case-by-case approach with…

  • AMLA Direct Supervision: How Luxembourg Entities Are Identified for the 2027 Selection

    If a Luxembourg credit institution or financial institution ends up on AMLA’s list of selected obliged entities, its day-to-day AML/CFT supervisor changes. Its supervisor moves from the CSSF to a Frankfurt-based EU body that reviews policies, runs inspections, and can impose pecuniary sanctions. AMLA direct supervision is that mechanism, and the data that decides who…

  • CSSF AML/CFT Sanction: Enforcement Lessons From the March 2026 Fine

    A CSSF AML/CFT sanction rarely turns on an exotic typology. It turns on the housekeeping. The administrative fine the CSSF imposed on 5 March 2026, and published on a nominative basis on 9 June 2026, is a clean example. A Luxembourg specialised professional of the financial sector running a domiciliation business was fined EUR 56,000…

  • AMLA Direct Supervision: Which Obliged Entities the CSSF Will Identify

    The most expensive scoping mistake a Luxembourg compliance team can make right now is assuming someone else will flag it for AMLA direct supervision. The Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism picks its first set of directly supervised firms in 2027, and the data that feeds that decision is being collected…

  • MiCAR Reporting Obligations for CASPs: Complete Implementation Guide

    Introduction MiCAR (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) creates the first comprehensive regulatory framework requiring crypto-asset service providers to implement authorization, prudential reporting, transaction monitoring, and incident notification systems. The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) represents the first unified rulebook for crypto-asset activities across the entire European Union. For reporting teams and compliance practitioners, MiCAR…

  • AML Reporting in Luxembourg: STRs, GoAML, and Your Obligations

    Introduction AML reporting in Luxembourg is mandatory for every regulated financial institution and obliged entity – failure to file suspicious transaction reports exposes your firm to regulatory sanctions, reputational damage, and legal liability. For compliance officers, risk managers, and AML practitioners in Luxembourg’s financial sector, understanding when and how to file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs)…