Regulation (EU) 2023/1113

  • AMLA MiCA Review Response: Five AML/CFT Gaps It Asks the EC to Review

    On 7 October 2026 the Authority for Anti-Money Laundering and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (AMLA) published its response to the European Commission’s targeted consultation on the review of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA). The AMLA MiCA review paper is dated 30 September 2026, the day the consultation closed, and reads MiCA…

  • TIPS Pix Interlinking: The ECB Starts a Brazil Feasibility Study

    On 24 September 2026 the ECB announced that its Governing Council had approved a feasibility assessment for TIPS Pix interlinking: a possible connection between the Eurosystem’s TARGET Instant Payment Settlement (TIPS) platform and Pix, the fast payment system owned and operated by the Central Bank of Brazil. The two central banks will work through technical,…

  • The EU AML Package: The Countdown to 10 July 2027

    On 17 September 2026 the Czech Financial Analytical Office (Finanční analytický úřad, or FAÚ) opened a guidance series for the firms it supervises, titled the AML package step by step. Its first instalment is narrow and practical: which legal texts will govern anti-money-laundering and counter-terrorist-financing work from 10 July 2027. That date is the pivot…

  • FATF Travel Rule Implementation: The Enforcement Gap

    On 16 July 2026 the Financial Action Task Force published its seventh targeted update on how countries are implementing the FATF standards for virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. The headline finding is that implementation remains uneven. Of the 109 jurisdictions answering the Travel Rule legislation question, 91, or 83 percent, reported legislation in…

  • Wolfsberg Non-Bank PSP Guidance: Banking the Sector Without De-Risking

    On 15 July 2026 the Wolfsberg Group published its Guidance on the Provision of Banking Services to non-bank Payment Service Providers, and it lands on a problem most financial crime teams already know by feel: the bank holds the account, but it is several parties removed from the person actually sending the money. The new…

  • FATF Travel Rule Consultation: What EU Payment Firms and CASPs Should Consider

    A cross-border payment is held due to incomplete beneficiary information. The originator name is present, the amount is present, but the beneficiary field is a single block of free text that the receiving institution’s screening engine cannot parse into a name, a country and a town. The transfer is held, a customer complains, and an…